Friday, December 24, 2010

How are we just finding out about this now?


Science is a pretty crazy thing, don't you think? You know, how it's always changing and everything. One day it's this, the next day it's that. So it's like, what the hell are we supposed to expect today? Oh, those crazy scientists! Well, this fun fact is a lot more useful for your everyday life... but I guess that depends on what your everyday life consists of.*

So what the fuck am I talking about? Well, I'm going to tell you right now.

Best hangover food is honey on toast, and science says so:
The Royal Society of Chemistry claim that the fructose in the honey – which is
also found in golden syrup – is essential to help the body break down alcohol
into harmless by-products.

Serving the honey on toast adds potassium and sodium to the meal which is
also helps the body cope with the alcohol.

(I am very aware that this last sentence kind of makes no sense... it's missing a word or has an extra one, but I didn't write it)

So let's all drink more alcohol than usual, get really blackout drunk, do some crazy shit that we'll never remember, and then have some honey on toast. Sounds strangely like my family's annual reunion.**






*This is particularly useful for all those alcoholics out there. I know you like to drink, now it doesn't have to hurt so much.
**My family does not actually hold an annual reunion.

How to be a pedestrian: a simple guide on crossing the street


A friend of mine out here in Oakland requested that I write a post on how people in this city do not know street-crossing etiquette. My friend did not suggest the topic as elegantly as I just previously described it, but I'm getting there. Just gotta get myself a little worked up a bit before the sparks start to fly.


First off, it should be known that there are many crosswalks in the middle of the street, not at lights, that privilege pedestrians with the right of way. I have experienced this in other places. At certain street corners where a traffic lights are absent, it is only right to afford the pedestrian with the right of way, because then no car would ever let anyone cross the street. I don't even mind when people cross the street in these places. They're allowed to. They're supposed to. I do it when I'm walking, and expect traffic to stop for me. It's just how crosswalks work, ya know? Of course, you sometimes get the person with no judgement or sense of distance/speed, and they just decide that they want to cross the street at that exact second because they can do whatever they want. They still have the right of way, and if I don't think I'll drive through the crosswalk without hitting them, I'll stop. Yeah, I'm that asshole.


But, pedestrians are assholes, too. Especially around here where everyone takes their sweet ass time doing everything. A five minute walk turns into a 30 minute adventure. My brain has gradually adjusted my concept of time to better suit that of the west coast... but it's still tough.

My point is that some people really don't get the concept that cars drive faster than people walk, and if you're going to interrupt traffic at a place where there are no crosswalks, then you need to be quick. You should be running. No, you should be sprinting. You gotta have some pretty huge balls to be such an overt asshole with the prospect of even possibly causing an accident and/or your own death.


So, back to Oaklanders and their inability to properly cross the street. There are lot of crackheads and disabled peopl in this area. People with bum legs. People in wheelchairs. People tweaking from withdrawal. I am in no way trying to compare crackheads with genuinely handicapped people, but they're all slow movers- that's the point. They also seemingly choose to not even look before crossing the street (perhaps their necks don't move very well?). They're ready to cross, so they put their good foot on the pavement and drag their other one along with them. Seriously. It's that painful. Like, dude, I was just driving 45mph and now you're moseying across the street, unsure of your destination, and interrupting the normal flow of traffic. And there's probably a crosswalk you could have used, so that the cars at least expect that someone may be crossing the street.


I really just can't comprehend any of it. If it is going to take you upwards of 25 seconds to cross the street, then you shouldn't be walking in front of traffic. You should be waiting for the lit up man to tell you when it's safe to cross.

To summarize how to properly and safely cross the street without angering anyone, all you really have to know is:
1. Be at a crosswalk
2. Wait until there are no cars very near to such crosswalk, so cars have time to stop and not hit you while you attempt your treacherous walk across the street (given this is not at a light that tells you when to walk)
3. Walk when the lit sign says it's okay (when you're at a light)
4. Don't cross when the countdown says you only have 1 second- who are you kidding? you won't make it, and you will only further piss off the non-pedestrians.
5. It is okay to cross the street when you don't have the right of way if there are actually no cars in sight. Don't think you can outbeat the car. Yes, they'll most likely stop for you- but you're being an asshole. Why couldn't you just wait the 30 seconds for the light to change? The car gets through the intersection and you get to safely cross the street. I'd say that's a win-win for everyone.
6. If you're a particularly slow moving person, don't make everyone else suffer for your inabilities. Cross when you can, stick to the crosswalks, and don't crazily run into the middle of the street expecting no cars to be around, because that's just silly.

Safe street crossings to everyone!

Thursday, December 23, 2010

And apparently everyone is okay with this...

The title of this post is in reference to this article, which discusses how Bridgewater, NJ spent $17,000 on legal and court fees to defend a $5 charge on a resident. Yeah... those numbers are correct. Tom Coulter filed a complaint with the New Jersey Government Record Council stating that he should have only had to pay the cost of the CD* (a recording of a city hall meeting), and not the $5 that he was actually charged. So, to defend their overcharging of City Hall CDs, Bridgewater paid upwards of $14,000 for their own legal fees to defend the case AND paid $3,500 to Coulter for his legal fees AND refunded him $4.04 for the price of the CD.

All Bridgewater had to do was refund the man his money, and they could have saved over $17,000 and a lot of headaches. But, instead, they chose to defend their profits, only to prove themselves as foolish and silly. I suppose this is kind of what karma is like? Regardless, this is what America has become-- greedy, money hungry, and selfish. God bless the USA, right? Well, we could use all the prayers we can get. (and I don't believe in god)







*Who buys a City Hall CD?
Hey guys, check out this stellar new album I picked up. Oh yeah, what's it called? It's called Bridgewater City Hall. It's really post-modern. Like post-post-modern. You gotta really open your mind to get the message it's conveying. Oh wow, that's super heavy, man. Yeah, I know.

Or what if you were going on a road trip with a friend and that's the CD he/she brought with them to play in the car. I imagine that would be the most boring road trip.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

whoopsies!

Last week Elie Wiesel was a guest on Fox & Friends. You know how on talk shows when a guest is featured, their name and what they do/have done/ why they're there is displayed on the screen? Well, Fox & Friends kind of messed that one up. Wiesel, who is a Holocaust survivor and Nobel Peace Prize winner, was featured with the description of "Holocaust Winner." Whoops!

Now, I don't think that the Holocaust ever really had a winner. If anything, just millions of losers. Regardless, check out the screen shot below.


Fox & Friends is pretty presumptuous declaring one man the victor of an over ten year long genocide.

{via Mediaite and Fark}

hastily made, but necessary to share

Just like the title says, this is a hastily made blog post, yet I really wanted to show you this video. It goes along with my previous post about The Strokes ruling 2011 and their general awesomeness. After reading the post, my friend Panch sent me this mash-up video of The Strokes' Hard to Expain vs. Christina Aguilera's Genie in a Bottle, "A Stroke of Genius," by the freelance hellraiser. The song features the instrumentals of The Strokes and the vocal stylings of Aguilera. Needless to say, it's pretty good. Pretty damn good.

The video for the song is a mashup of the two songs' videos. However, I do not believe that the mashup artist made the video.


The Strokes will rule 2011


I've really been on such a Strokes kick lately. I simply cannot get enough of them. Even though they haven't released an album in almost 5 years, I don't get sick of any of their material. It all resonates in my brain and makes me crave more, more, more. I think I secretly just want to be Julian Casablancas, but I suppose that's not really a secret any more, now is it?

I saw The Strokes for the first and only time (so far!) this past August at the Outside Lands music festival in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park. I had always enjoyed their music, but never got to experience it live, and since then, I've been more hooked than ever.

So now all I find myself doing is anxiously awaiting the anticipated March 2011 release of The Strokes' comeback album. So far, it appears to be on schedule (finally! since this album has been in the works for years, kept getting postponed due to the band members' solo and side projects). I imagine a truly epic tour coinciding with the album's release. So people, be prepared. 2011 is almost upon is and sooner than we realize it will be March, and we will all be rocking out to the The Strokes' new album.

For the time being, you can enjoy some of these music videos.







New York Pride and Road Rage... strangely similar



New Yorkers are known for their aggressive driving style. Weaving in and out of slower cars. Speeding by the elder. Not stopping for pedestrians. Road rage. It's kind of what we're known for.

Earlier this morning I had to run an errand in San Francisco. On my way back to Oakland, right after merging on to the Bay Brdige, a Red Jeep Laredo started frantically honking at me, then hastily switched lanes, drove up right next to me, and gave me this stare down/point. I was actually kind of terrified. I thought this man was sending me some kind of death threat. I hadn't done anything wrong. I didn't cut him off. I wasn't being the asshole driver I am sometimes known to be. But I was scared. Maybe this guy was having an awfully terrible day?

In desperate need of a lane switchage (the car in front of me was driving painfully slow), I relocated myself to behind the RJL, making sure to keep my distance so as not to further piss him off. Once I was behind the RJL I saw a big old Yankees bumper sticker. This made me giggle and goofily smile. I had mistaken this man's seemingly angry eye contact and point move he made earlier for road rage, when it was actually his way of saying "Go New York!" (I still have my NY license plates).

I gave the the man in RJL a big thumbs up and a smile as I continued to weave through the rest of the slowly moving California drivers.


And, so, New Yorkers are aggressive. Whether they're driving or just trying to share in their New York pride with another, there's nothing passive about any of it.